Daos, Blockchain, And The Potential Of Ownerless Business

Blockchain technology combines cryptography and distributed computing to provide a multiparty consensus algorithm to securely exchange value. Combining the disintermediation benefits of blockchain with the intelligence of smart contracts can help automate energy exchanges and give impetus to more distributed autonomous energy organizations . This chapter combines applied blockchain research by the author at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory with a new theoretical approach that explores how blockchain technology could help enable more distributed, autonomous, and secure energy organizations. DAEO may also help simplify and improve the efficiency of energy utilities by securely linking producers with consumers and creating prosumers with increased flexibility and control of how they generate, consume, and exchange energy. Underlying the Bitcoin payment system is the blockchain software supported by ongoing protocol updates . In terms of governance, miners’ voting on protocol update proposals resembles the community-based management of open source software development observed for projects such as Linux. It aligns stakeholder expectations and facilitates knowledge sharing, problem solving, and the realization of collective outcomes (O’Mahony and Lakhani 2011).

By removing the system of delegated power and giving it to the stakeholders, DAOs mitigate fund managers’ and directors’ incentives to misappropriate funds. Protocols distribute a governance token enabling their past and present users to vote on network decisions. These tend to be protocol parameter adjustments or smart contract upgrades. Given the complex and technical nature of these decisions, some protocols see a handful of knowledgeable delegates emerge as thought and execution leaders in governance. The blockchain-centric model of a decentralized autonomous organization seeks to address a problem present in almost every business – regardless of industry or size.

The Merits And Pitfalls Of Decentralized Autonomous Organizations

These data are held in private, centralized ledgers controlled by institutions such as banks. Distributed ledgers are public and require no trusted intermediary to verify who has title to what. Proof-of-work mining is a computationally intensive and highly redundant process that generates inefficiencies in terms of energy consumption. But as a result, the blockchain record cannot be tampered with at a profit. With machine consensus, tasks are allocated based on commitments in computing power, and rewarded competitively based on the outcome of mining. Table1 shows how Bitcoin as a payment system organizes differently from banks and payment organizations. To resolve this issue, Bitcoin relies on cryptographic routines to verify, timestamp, and order transactions in a non-reversible way, thereby avoiding the need for human reconciliation.

Similarly, DAO members will influence and determine the relative risks and implementations of new asset classes such as centralized synthetic assets including tokenized T-bills. While the list described below is by no means all encompassing, it should provide a good grasp on some of the more well known DAOs that have been created to date. Take note that each of these DAOs have different missions, rules and structures, but are all focused on the long-term growth and evolution of blockchain and cryptocurrencies as a whole. When it comes to the distributed ethos of blockchain-based systems, it should come as no surprise that company structuring is also begging to be disrupted. More specifically, we’re seeing a swift rise in the number of DAOs that have been created to tackle a plethora of issues surrounding the industry today. It requires a product/market fit, business model realization and a lot of users/customers. Early on, a lot of assumptions are made, and the DAO may resemble science-fiction until the product/service hits the market forces realities. The “proof of success” will be sustainability in the market, not the pre-sales success.

Distributed Autonomous Organizations

Another hardship that arises is the difficulty of changing the code of a DAO or the smart contracts once deployed in the blockchain. On one hand, this is good because one single entity cannot change the rules, but the disadvantage is that debugging cannot be done. This is what happened with The DAO company, attackers slowly drained all funds by simply exploiting a bug in the system. The head coders of Ethereum reversed all transactions but the best way to handle such an event in the future is up for debate. The open source community has also jumped into the DAO game, with several notable projects coming to the fore.

My third concern is that the history of technology, particularly those involving network effects, shows that decentralization is often accompanied by centralization simultaneously. The personal computer revolution democratized computing power into the hands of ordinary citizens and workers and yet simultaneously created the Microsoft monopoly. The promise of the decentralized internet with distributed content creation and consumption has come true, yet search has become a significant bottleneck with Google currently acting as a centralized gateway. Similarly, in social media, Facebook has enabled disparate communities and individuals to connect and share information, yet it has centralized the matching of friends and the connections. Blockchain technology also exhibits network effects, and many of the novel applications being developed require ecosystem coordination ; thus I expect centralization also to emerge. In many ways, blockchain is a foundational technology that foreshadows significant economic, technological, and organizational change . Tracking transactions between entities is a core organizational task and blockchain has reconceived this tracking function from being private and centralized to one that is public, decentralized, and potentially programmable. Even blockchain, the database architecture underpinning all tokens today will likely be supplanted by superior variants.

Decentralized Autonomous Organizationsdao

By analogy, what we see now, and will keep seeing in the foreseeable future, is the co-existence of an “Internet” of public blockchains, so to speak, and of various “Intranets” made of private corporate ledgers. And we will see DAOs compete against traditional firms, much like Bitcoin has been competing with Western Union in the global remittances industry. Distributed ledgers enable DAOs but will also find many applications inside more traditional organizations, as a transparent means of decentralized task allocation, task division, reward distribution, and information flow. For example, firms may develop internal reputation mechanisms enabled through the exchange of tokens, recorded in a distributed ledger free for all to inspect. Those who own tokens can use them to reward cooperation from others, or to exchange them for other things of value, such as vacation days. This could enable far more peer-to-peer collaboration among people who do not already know one another well, without needing a common supervisor as a trusted intermediary.

• Any kind of contract could also reside on a blockchain, written in computer code rather than ordinary legal jargon.
• Funding is usually in the form of investing in tokens that are spent within the organization.
• The miners, not the users, have voting rights that allow them to decide when and how the software or its rules of use may be altered.
• Many of these mutual-support networks have fallen away in an age of mobility and frayed communities, but maybe crypto-currency can bring them back.
• When a starfish organization breaks down and conflicts are broken down, its organization will become a smaller decentralized organization that will continue to function; and spider organizations will not be able to continue operating after the heads are cut.

They also transparently document and preserve each element of the blockchain in a way that is difficult to spoof or alter. For miners—parties who supply the computing power to run the system—they provide a means of compensation for providing infrastructure and running its software for distributed autonomous organization the benefit of the users. The miners, not the users, have voting rights that allow them to decide when and how the software or its rules of use may be altered. With varied terrain and a hearty population Wyoming has long been a haven for independent thinkers and doers – pioneers.

Therefore, one of the most important aspects of blockchain research is Institutional Technoloay. Blockchain brings an automated trust system, and people can freely transfer value without trusting each other or a third party. In other words, I transfer money to you online, just like I give you cash in person, it is a matter that only you and me are involved in. When this is done, the programmability of currency is brought about, and the management of the organization may be automatically completed through code. Yet the appeal of Ethereum is that it provides a platform for those who don’t want to build a private blockchain to create, organise and govern. This opens blockchain technology up to a world far beyond helping big financial corporations and markets achieve efficiency gains. Although it’s easy to make fun of investors, the fact is that the better ones are extremely skeptical and perform a ton of due diligence before deciding to pull the trigger on an investment. The slowness of funding from a VC firm is not a function of paper-based legacy systems causing delays. It is a human problem where people simplydon’t want to give their money away unless you’ve generated sufficient FOMO/investor tingles. The big idea that makes crypto-currency tick in the first place is the blockchain.

In current distributed cryptocurrency networks, Trust is generated by Miners. Miners deliver a Service to the network, for which they get paid e.g. in bitcoin for solving a hash algorithm (finding a ‘nonce’). In an intelligent System aiming to decentralize standardization of interchange formats, we would give Miners the additional task to mediate between different Systems data-formats allowing Ledgers to communicate. Traditional hierarchical governance is also a single point of failure system. Therefore, the governance of the DAO is based on the equal status of users on the network, and the final decision must be completed by the consensus algorithm. Blockchain, like the Internet, has more to change the way people collaborate.

An example of active working includes delivering on bounties for specific projects such as finding bugs, developing software, ethical hacking, or any task that is required by the DAO. Passive working is typically accomplished by sharing something, such as your computer processing cycles, Internet access, storage, or even your data. Autonomous – autonomous agents, smart programs, and increased levels of artificial intelligence and AI algorithms will provide self-sustainability in operations and value creation at the centers, edges and arteries of an organization. Level 4 is when things are starting to get more serious in terms of giving people autonomy. So far, you’ve assumed your distributed teams are on a computer at the same time, clocking the same ‘office hours’. In other words, you don’t give them autonomy in terms of how they produce and to design their own days. Jacob Morgan contrasts several emerging organizational models in theFuture of Work.Emerging models include flat and holacratic organizations (vs. bureaucracies and hierarchies – and we know how well those functions!). Challenging traditional management around circlesfor specific projects and objectives is both liberating and transformational. The Covid-19 pandemic provides a wonderful opportunity for organizations to re-assess their rigid structures and flatten their organizations.

This causes the agent to make self-interested decisions, even if they had been originally tasked with looking after the principal. Additionally, Miners would use the Transaction History of Communicating Parties in Blockchains to suggest the best possible way of connecting. For example, if two parties communicated in the past via a standard suggested by W3C, the Miner would typically try to re-use that format for these and similar sender & receivers. Picking applicable Formats would be based on attributes of the communication parties like technology stack, typical use cases or industry. It is possible that the innovations that prove the most transformative will actually be those parts of our social fabric that are currently not reaching their full potential because no effective distributed coordination mechanism exists. Needless to say, like all activities at the frontiers, The DAO will be highly risky as an investment, and not just because nine in ten start-ups fail.
undefined
The DAO tokens were sold in an Initial Coin Offering and provided an ownership stake and voting rights in this decentralized fund. However, shortly after launch, about a third of the funds were drained from it in one of the largest hacks in the history of cryptocurrencies. For instance, a car that owns itself and provides ridesharing services as a part of a DAC could operate autonomously, carrying out transactions with humans and other devices. Through the use of blockchain oracles, it could even trigger smart contracts and perform certain tasks on its own, such as going to the mechanic. More complex DAOs may be deployed for different use cases, such as token governance, decentralized venture funds, or social media platforms.

When a person wants to build up an organization with the other party, the involvement of money and funding in this process demands a lot of trust in the parties you are working with. But it is not a wise move to trust anyone you just interacted with on the internet for your business. But by using DAO, one doesn’t need to stress out in finding trustable people as the DAO system will provide you with a hundred per cent credibility and transparency on DAO code. This advancement draws in so many opportunities for worldwide collaboration. Further, the articles of organization must include a publicly available identifier of any smart contract directly used to manage, facilitate or operate the DAO. If the DAO’s smart contracts have been updated or changed, the articles of organization shall be amended accordingly.
undefined
Dapps, or Decentralized Applications, are essentially unstoppable apps, which work on the Ethereum Blockchain and are powered by smart contracts. The main difference from ordinary apps is that Dapps are fully autonomous, they don’t require a middleman to operate and basically immune to censorship. In other words, they establish a direct connection between a user and a service. Through that, users can fully control the information and data they share. Essentially, DAOs enable people to exchange its funds with anyone in the world. This can be done in the form of an investment, a charitable donation, money raising, borrowing and so on, all without an intermediary. One potentially major problem with the voting system is that even if a security hole was spotted in an initial code, it can’t be corrected until the majority votes on it. While the voting takes place, said hackers can exploit a bug in the code. After the funding period is over and a DAO is deployed, it becomes fully autonomous and completely independent from its creators as well as anyone else for that matter.

Funding is usually in the form of investing in tokens that are spent within the organization. Community members who invest will now have voting rights on the organizational operations. Surprisingly enough, I believe it is the case of Bitcoin—arguably the most prominent blockchain-based venture—that supports my reasoning best. Undoubtedly, its functioning hinges on the functionality of the ledger and the possibility for individuals to exchange sensitive information in the absence of trust , as the authors neatly showed in their case description.
undefined
How to develop and evolve in the future is still worth looking forward to. The distributed autonomous organization stores everything in a decentralized storage network, which is open and transparent and cannot be tampered with. To conclude, we would like to point out that the rise of DAOs in the real world is accompanied, in academic circles, by the rise of “cryptoeconomics,” a nascent discipline examining how decentralized networks and tokens can incentivize collective value creation. Imagine, for instance, that users of a social network had to stake tokens representing value to be able to post a video. If that video turns out to be fake news or hate speech, the user loses her stake. If it turns out to be content valuable to others and becomes viral, the user gets rewarded with additional tokens. Similarly, users who help police the network by flagging hate speech get rewarded, and users who act as trend spotters by noticing viral content before it becomes viral get rewarded too. Using cryptocurrency tokens to create this kind of incentives could help mitigate some of the issues currently faced by, say, Facebook, by disincentivizing harmful behavior and giving users ownership of their personal data . Determining the cryptographic, governance, and economic rules for creating, distributing, and exchanging the tokens to obtain the desired collective outcomes is the subject of cryptoeconomics. It draws on various disciplines, including behavioral economics, social psychology, game theory, network and computer engineering, and cryptography.

These tokens secure voting and perhaps usage rights for projects that range from explicit to vague. For instance, an ICO can be pledged to the development of a software program. Token buyers may be compensated by low-cost or privileged access to the program as users. They may also have rights to participate revenues earned by the program, and they may be compensated for contributions to the software. Token holders may or may not have voting rights that govern how the software is developed. A central, hierarchical organization could also make those decisions, with the token’s value depending on the quality of those choices and how well they are executed. In our current platform economy that has been built on web 2.0 technologies over the past decade, organizations are a hybrid of distributed automated platform and centralized business organization managed by people. Platforms, like YouTube, Alibaba, WeChat, Upwork or Uber, represent a combination of both centralized digital platform, operated by a private business, and distribute user-generated systems build on the platform by hundreds of millions of users.